The U.S. Centers for disease control (CDC) has hailed water fluoridation as one of the top 10 public health achievements of the 20th century.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom beginning in 1945, it was claimed that adding fluoride to drinking water was a safe and effective way to improve people’s dental health. Over the decades, many bought into this hook, line and sinker, despite all the evidence to the contrary.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom the featured film, “our daily dose,” reviews some of this evidence. As noted in the film’s synopsis:

“filmmaker jeremy seifert lays out the dangers of water fluoridation informatively and creatively, highlighting the most current research and interviewing top-tier doctors, activists, and attorneys close to the issue.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom through thoughtful examination of old beliefs and new science, the film alerts us to the health threat present in the water and beverages we rely on every day.” [seifert’s film is at the top of article]

cognitive learning theory in the classroom

It was primarily created as an educational vehicle aimed at those who may not be aware of these issues, or who might not yet be entirely convinced that drinking fluoride isn’t a good thing.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom so PLEASE, share this video with all of your friends and family who are on the fence on this issue, and ask them to watch it. It’s only 20 minutes long, but it packs a lot of compelling details into those 20 minutes.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom

Understanding how fluoride affects your body and brain is particularly important for parents with young children, and pregnant women. It’s really crucial to know that you should NEVER mix infant formula with fluoridated tap water for example, as this may overexpose your child to 100 times the proposed “safe” level of fluoride exposure for infants!Cognitive learning theory in the classroom

Scientific investigations have revealed that fluoride is an endocrine-disrupting chemical, 1 and a developmental neurotoxin that impacts short-term and working memory, and lowers IQ in children. 2It has been implicated as a contributing factor in the rising rates of both attention-deficit hyperactive disorder (ADHD) 3, 4 and thyroid disease.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom

Children are particularly at risk for adverse effects of overexposure, and in april 2015, the US government admitted that the “optimal” level of fluoride recommended since 1962 had in fact been too high.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom as a result, over 40 percent of american teens show signs of fluoride overexposure 6 — a condition known as dental fluorosis. In some areas, dental fluorosis rates are as high as 70 to 80 percent, with some children suffering from advanced forms.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom

So, for the first time, the U.S. Department of health and human services (HHS) lowered its recommended level of fluoride in drinking water 7, 8, 9 by 40 percent, from an upper limit of 1.2 milligrams per liter (mg/L) to 0.7 mg/L.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom the HHS said it will evaluate dental fluorosis rates among children in 10 years to assess whether they were correct about this new level being protective against dental fluorosis.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom but just what is the acceptable level of harm in the name of cavity prevention?

According to the film, the CDC estimates water fluoridation decreases dental decay by, at most, 25 percent.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom recent research 14, 15 however, suggests the real effect may be far lower. Based on the findings of three papers assessing the effectiveness of fluoridation on tooth decay, the researchers concluded that water fluoridation does not reduce cavities to a statistically significant degree in permanent teeth.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom

Fluoride can also cross the placenta, causing developing fetuses to be exposed to fluoride. Considering the fact that fluoride has endocrine-disrupting activity, this is hardly a situation amenable to the good health of that child.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom it’s important to realize that fluoride is not a nutrient. It’s a drug, and it’s the ONLY drug that is purposely added directly into drinking water.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom

As stated, fluoride is a drug, and research into the health effects of fluoride are based on pharmaceutical grade fluoride. However, a majority of water authorities do not even use pharmaceutical grade fluoride; they use hydrofluosilicic acid, or hexafluorosilicic acid — toxic waste products of the phosphate fertilizer industry, which are frequently contaminated with heavy metals such as arsenic, mercury, cadmium, lead and other toxins.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom

This is a key point that many fluoride proponents fail to address when arguing for its use. Indeed, holding elected officials accountable for procuring proof that the specific fluoridation chemical used actually fulfills fluoride’s health and safety claims and complies with all regulations, laws and risk assessments required for safe drinking water, has been a successful strategy for halting water fluoridation in a number of areas around the U.S.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom

“… in regard to the use of fluosilicic acid as a source of fluoride for fluoridation, this agency regards such use as an ideal environmental solution to a long-standing problem.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom by recovering by-product fluosilicic acid from fertilizer manufacturing, water and air pollution are minimized, and water utilities have a low-cost source of fluoride available to them…” data and science do not support water fluoridation

cognitive learning theory in the classroom

Ninety-seven percent of western european countries do not fluoridate their water, and data collected by the world health organization (WHO) show that non-fluoridating countries have seen the exact same reduction in dental cavities as the U.S., 16 where a majority of water is still fluoridated.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom if fluoride were in fact the cause of this decline, non-fluoridating countries should not show the same trend.

Clearly, declining rates of dental decay are not in and of themselves proof that water fluoridation actually works.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom it’s also worth noting that well over 99 percent of the fluoride added to drinking water never even touches a tooth; it simply runs down the drain, contaminating and polluting the environment.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom source: KK cheng et.Al. BMJ 2007. 17 rates of cavities have declined by similar amounts in countries with and without fluoridation. Ending fluoridation will be the greatest public health achievement of the 21 st century

cognitive learning theory in the classroom

Despite the fact that the scientific evidence does not support fluoridation, those who question or openly oppose it are typically demonized and written off as crazy conspiracy theorists.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom many fluoride supporters claim the science of fluoridation was “settled” some 50 years ago — effectively dismissing all the revelations produced by modern science!Cognitive learning theory in the classroom

Indeed, as noted in the film, ending water fluoridation will be one of the greatest public health achievements of the 21st century, and I for one will not stop until that happens.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom to learn more about why water fluoridation runs counter to good science, common sense and the public good, please see the following video, which recounts 10 important fluoride facts.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom

On may 19 to 26, we launch fluoride awareness week. We set aside an entire week dedicated to ending the practice of fluoridation. There’s no doubt about it: fluoride should not be ingested.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom even scientists from the environmental protection agency’s (EPA) national health and environmental effects research laboratory have classified fluoride as a “chemical having substantial evidence of developmental neurotoxicity.”

cognitive learning theory in the classroom

Furthermore, according to screenings conducted for the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC), 65% of american adolescents now have dental fluorosis — unattractive discoloration and mottling of the teeth that indicate overexposure to fluoride—up from 41% a decade ago.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom clearly, children are continuing to be overexposed, and their health and development put in jeopardy. Why?

The only real solution is to stop the archaic practice of artificial water fluoridation in the first place.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom fortunately, the fluoride action network (FAN), has a game plan to END fluoridation worldwide. Clean pure water is a prerequisite to optimal health.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom industrial chemicals, drugs and other toxic additives really have no place in our water supplies. So please, protect your drinking water and support the fluoride-free movement by making a tax-deductible donation to the fluoride action network today.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom together, let’s help FAN get to the finish line

So, I am stepping up the challenge. We are turning the tide against fluoride, but the fight is not over.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom I’m proud to play my part in this crucial battle. For the eighth year in a row, a portion of sales from purchases made on the mercola online store, up to $25,000, will be donated to fluoride action network.Cognitive learning theory in the classroom please make a donation today to help FAN end the absurdity of fluoridation.