CHICAGO, ILLINOIS – MAY 16: jaxson hayes participates in workouts during day one of the NBA draft combine at quest multisport complex on may 16, 2019 in chicago, illinois.Cognitive learning strategies examples NOTE TO USER: user expressly acknowledges and agrees that, by downloading and or using this photograph, user is consenting to the terms and conditions of the getty images license agreement. (photo by stacy revere/getty images) over 60 NCAA basketball prospects attended the 2019 NBA draft combine in chicago this week, participating in a barrage of shooting drills, anthro measurements, strength and agility tests, five-on-five scrimmages and interviews.Cognitive learning strategies examples with so much going on in just two days, there was plenty to take in.

Years and years of competitive basketball are viewed by scouts and team personnel for the NBA draft, as top prospects are watched and analyzed from their budding days as scrawny unsuspecting high school students to their days as matured men on the collegiate hardwood floors of NCAA basketball or amateur leagues overseas.Cognitive learning strategies examples weaknesses are scrutinized, personalities are studied, physical attributes are measured, skills are examined, and stats and film are picked apart number-by-number and frame-by-frame.Cognitive learning strategies examples

Between adolescence and adulthood, NBA teams are able to scout prospects as they develop over the years, with these players establishing reputations and perceptions among league circles that evolve and change over time.Cognitive learning strategies examples whenever the annual NBA draft roles around, teams will have plenty of material to look through when deciding who is and who isn’t worth one of the 60 selections of the night.Cognitive learning strategies examples from a logical standpoint, small samples and random outings shouldn’t be enough to significantly sway the opinions of scouts and front offices.Cognitive learning strategies examples

This year, over 60 prospective draftees traveled to chicago to participate in the 2019 NBA draft combine, where they underwent a series of interviews, agility tests, vertical tests, and 5-on-5 scrimmages to give teams a chance to view prospects all in one massively chaotic setting.Cognitive learning strategies examples although it would seem more reasonable for a scout or front office executive to weigh a full season — or better yet, a full college career — of play as more meaningful than a couple of scrimmages, but these people are only human.Cognitive learning strategies examples recency bias is a powerful thing, as is momentum, and every year prospects see their stock rise and fall depending on performances at the combine and even the NCAA tournament.Cognitive learning strategies examples

The athletic tests — lane agility, three-quarter court sprint, shuttle run, standing and max vertical leaps — aren’t true tests of whether a player’s physical gifts are noteworthy on the floor, although they do generate considerable buzz on television and social media.Cognitive learning strategies examples A 43-inch max vert sounds nice and looks cool whenever a player is skying for a dunk or a block, but what does that mean if they’re not actually using it in a functional way out in a competitive setting?Cognitive learning strategies examples jordan bone jumped out of the gym this year with his 43-inch max vert, but he doesn’t use it on a regular basis as a rebounder or finisher, so does it really matter?Cognitive learning strategies examples

Likewise, the process of measuring for height, wingspan, standing reach and weight is a valuable way of gaining tangible numbers to understand the size of players large and small.Cognitive learning strategies examples putting a number on someone’s wingspan, such as nassir little’s impressive 7-1 frame, can benefit their perception as a finisher or versatile defender, but if that length isn’t utilized effectively on the floor, does it actually matter?Cognitive learning strategies examples

Additionally, do these numbers really tell us anything? Both ty jerome and tyler herro, a pair of 6-6 guards with first round potential, were measured as having negative wingspans at 6-4 and 6-3 respectively.Cognitive learning strategies examples this hints at concerns over their ability to finish around the basket and corral opponents on the defensive end, since they don’t have the benefit of added length to stretch past a shot-blocker’s reach or the extra inches to swallow up an opposing ball-handler.Cognitive learning strategies examples

Those who have regularly watched both jerome and herro are aware of their physical limitations and how the lack of length manifested itself on a regular basis.Cognitive learning strategies examples jerome’s short arms (and lack of burst and strength) hindered him as a driver, as he routinely stopped short of the basket and tossed up a floater since he was unable to score against contests.Cognitive learning strategies examples herro, albeit tough for his size, experienced similar issues.

Another player that will likely be hit with unnecessary blowback is gonzaga’s brandon clarke, who measured in as 6-8 with a 6-8 wingspan, a seemingly troubling combination for someone who suited up regularly as the team’s starting center and who projects to be a big in the NBA.Cognitive learning strategies examples he is small for a big, unquestionably, but it was known that he wasn’t an owner of plus-length or size at his position.

Freaking out over measurements is a common thing, and some executives will likely (and wrongfully) lower him on their draft boards and worry about his transition to the NBA on offense and defense, but doing so would be an act of cognitive dissonance.Cognitive learning strategies examples just look at his tape, his stats, his off-the-charts mobility and athleticism that was calculated while in chicago. Clarke posted elite block numbers at gonzaga, using elite timing and defensive IQ, along with his 40.5-inch max vert, to rotate onto shooters and send shots into the stands.Cognitive learning strategies examples he was a strong rim-running lob threat and strong rebounder, too, so are his subpar measurements really that bad? Of course not! Functional athleticism matters, as mentioned previously, as does playing above your size — clarke is a perfect examples of both traits.Cognitive learning strategies examples

Athletic tests and measurements are meaningless, but it does matter how they’re perceived and used as evaluation tools for NBA front offices.Cognitive learning strategies examples interviews are better tools for gathering new insights into the mentalities of players and their capacity for learning and growth as players (and, generally, as human beings), and strong answers can do quite a bit to convince teams to select certain players.Cognitive learning strategies examples

Keldon johnson provided great answers pertaining to his desire to work hard and expand his offensive game; coby white didn’t give much insight into his transformation from scoring guard to point guard, but his lively personality was charming and likeable, which is significant as well; nassir little answered questions about his playing time and role at UNC with maturity and a surprising level of introspection, which won’t go unnoticed by teams that listened; and the aforementioned clarke provided a refreshing level of self-awareness pertaining to how he makes up for his short arms on defense.Cognitive learning strategies examples